All posts by admin

Prosecutorial Discretion in Bond

(Richard M. Re) Who would have thought that Bond v. United States — today’s much-awaited decision involving the Chemical Weapons Convention — would have so much to do with prosecutorial discretion? Yet prosecutorial discretion appeared repeatedly in the Court’s consideration of the case, serving different purposes each time.

First, the fact of prosecutorial discretion is the critical factor explaining why Bond even arose. By way of background, the defendant Bond used certain harmful chemicals to retaliate against a romantic rival. Bond was then prosecuted for violating federal legislation implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention. In Bond, the Court relied on federalism canons to conclude that the implementing legislation didn’t reach Bond’s conduct. A major theme of the majority opinion is that Bond is an “unusual” and “curious case” that is “worlds apart” from what anyone would have associated with the Chemical Weapons Convention or its implementing legislation. Another major theme is that the “common law assault” at issue in Bond would normally be handled by state and local government. But if that’s so, then why was the defendant federally prosecuted? The answer is that the federal prosecutors involved in the case concluded — contrary to the intuitive view — that the Convention’s implementing legislation properly applied.

Second, prudent use of prosecutorial discretion was a source of comfort to the majority, since it meant that the Court’s statutory holding wouldn’t have harmful effects. “[W]ith the exception of this unusual case,” Bond noted, “the Federal Government itself has not looked to section 229 to reach purely local crimes.” Instead, federal authorities had previously used the relevant statutory authority primarily to prosecute things akin to “assassination, terrorism, and acts with the potential to cause mass suffering,” and the Court declined to “disrupt the Government’s authority to prosecute such offenses.”

Read rest of article

The Myth of the Trial Penalty?

(Dan Markel) Every now and then, I like to spotlight some articles that unsettle the conventional wisdom, particularly in criminal law. Add this oneto the file. Almost every teacher of criminal procedure is aware of the idea of the “trial penalty,” which conveys the sense that defendants who exercise their right to a trial will invariably get a worse result if convicted than if they plea bargain. The leverage prosecutors have in exploiting the trial penalty dynamic was described by my friend Rich Oppel in a front page NYT story he wrote a few years back.

 

Comes now (or relatively recently at least) David Abrams from Penn with an article that slays the sacred cow of the trial penalty by providing, you know, data. And the data is the best kind of data because inasmuch as it’s true, it is SURPRISING data. Specifically, Abrams argues that based on the study he performed (which originally appeared in JELS and now appears in a more accessible form in Duquesne Law Review), the data supports the view that in fact there’s a trial discount not a trial penalty. Fascinating stuff. Abrams offers some suggestions for what might explain this surprise: possibly a salience/availability bias on the part of the lawyers who remember the long penalties imposed after dramatic trials. Regardless of what explains the conventional wisdom, the competing claims should be ventilated in virtually every crim pro adjudication course.

Read rest of article

 

Top Chicago Criminal Lawyer – Launches Website as Educational Portal

Are you looking for the top Chicago criminal lawyer possible to handle your case? Are you unsure where to go for answers, or even know where to start? You’re not alone.

Chicago Criminal Lawyer aims to change that feeling of despair and helplessness that immediately follows being charged with a crime. And with glowing pride, they recently announced the launching of their new website designed specifically to help anyone charged with a criminal offense, get on the right path. To provide the best possible chance of a positive outcome through accurate information.

No matter what legal issue you are facing top chicago criminal lawyer, getting the right information at the right time is the key to a successful result.

Not only is having a strong, aggressive, and experienced lawyer on your side key to getting your freedom back. We believe that knowing and understanding the law as it pertains to your case trumps everything else, especially in the early stages.

Chicago Criminal Lawyer recently launched the site designed for education. The new website is designed specifically to help negotiate those turning and twisting roads that will inevitably be part of your life for the foreseeable future.

Before the Internet, people relied heavily on referrals to find the right product or service; consumers depended on experts to provide guidance and set the direction.

Today best chicago criminal lawyer, we have information at our fingertips. Providing the right information is precisely what they are trying to achieve; to become your only source of information to help you make the most educated decisions possible, while providing only the topChicago criminal lawyer for your case.

About Chicago Criminal Lawyer

Criminal Lawyer of Chicago’s skilled attorneys know their way around every court system in Illinois, exactly what you need help in. Calling one of our attorneys is the BEST decision you will ever make.

Chicago Criminal Lawyer

Michigan Avenue

Chicago, Illinois United States 60601

(877) 293-6028

petewest2014@gmail.co

http://criminallawyerchicago.org